Time to get REAL! American Eagle uses no airbrushing – but is it a real sample of today’s girls or just a ploy for more bucks?
This new ad campaign
launched by American Eagle’s line Aerie is meant to promote healthy body image
in girls by no longer using super models and retouching on their photo
shoots. They are using this ad campaign
to sell bras and panties to young girls, and are hoping to sell to more girls
by making them feel less self-conscious about their bodies by showing real
girls with real flaws.
They launched this ad
campaign with the following image on their website:
None of the subjects are
familiar in the ad and I haven’t seen any of them in any other advertisements.
The ad campaign began in January 2014 and as of today, they are still
continuing with their promise to not retouch photographs.
I first saw the ad on
their website when my teenage daughter was looking at clothes. Then I started seeing news stories about it
because in a world of retouching to the point of flawlessness and unachievable
bodies, this was huge news.
The persuasive
techniques I see on this advertisement are the plain-folks appeal – real girls
just like you. They are getting away
from the idea of perfection and using the plain-folks appeal to get girls and
young women to believe that just the regular girl down the street wears their
products, so they should too. No image of perfection, just a regular girl (although
the regular girls down the street in the ad campaign is still thin and doesn’t have
stretch marks or cellulite showing).
Aerie also incorporates
the Association Principle into their advertising campaign. They know that girls are super models! They want
you to know they love you just the way you are, no need to be perfect! Buy
their panties and bras because you’ll be cute too, just the way you are. It plays on the current trend of backlash
against all the retouching that happens in women’s advertising to create a
positive feeling of Aerie caring about the girls they sell to “just as they are”. One of the photos on their site even says “There’s
no such thing as a perfect beach body. The real you is sexy.”
They make very good use
of the medium. They have a hashtag
(#aerieReal) to make sure they trend on Twitter. They have information about their Aerie Real
campaign all over their website. And
they made sure to make it very public about what they were doing when they
first launched the campaign.
American Eagle and Aerie
have done something very new and different with this ad. They have come up with a way to continue to
sell bras, panties, and swimsuits to young women while making them feel better
about their own bodies. By proclaiming
they will use “real girls” and not retouch, they have approached a part of
advertising that hasn’t been done before.
Even celebrities are retouched in photographs, so to come out with a
campaign that forgoes the use of retouching is a first of its kind that I know
of.
The target audience for
this ad campaign is teenagers and young women.
They are wanting to connect with their target audience and make them
feel better about themselves to get them to spend money in their store. But the ad does include stereotypes – the girls
are still fairly thin, the photos on the website – while not retouched – are definitely
not of the average girl, and they stress being sexy a lot in the ads. So while they are saying it is about being
real, they are still stereotyping the typical girl as a thin, in shape,
modelesque type who can look outstanding in a string bikini without any kind of
retouching. I find it offensive that they stress being sexy so much since they
are targeting teenagers and that they don’t use a wider variety of body
types. Put a larger girl on their, a girl
with a lot of freckles, or a girl with a tummy that jiggles a bit. Those are real girls, so it is still giving a
false ideal about what a real girl is.
The ad is very strong in
portraying their concern for creating healthy body images by not retouching
their photographs. They really come
across as caring for girls, even going so far as having an open letter to the
people who go to their website, explaining why they are no longer going to use
super models or retouching. But the
weaknesses, as I’ve touched on previously, include the exclusion of girls of
all sizes. Telling an audience you are
going to use real girls and then excluding girls that make up the majority of
the population isn’t really using a representation of society. It is still using models, just not making
them airbrushed perfect. Girls pick up
on that. My teenager did. While a
memorable ad because it made me go “FINALLY” when I first read about it,
excited that my teenager might actually have some ads she could look at and
relate to the models, it is memorable also because it failed in the
reprenstation of a real girl. It does
effectively connect with the target audience though. My daughter and her friends all have talked
about the ad and have gone to the website to check out the models and compared
their bodies to those on Aerie’s site.
They were able to go “okay, I see a little tiny tummy, and I have a
little tiny tummy, so this is cool”. Doing
a quick search on Twitter using the #aerieReal hashtag, it appears they have
done an excellent job connecting with the target audience:
I wasn’t able to find an
article in any of the suggested media forums, but Time.com did do an article on
the campaign and felt the ad was a positive step in the right direction. They said “In a
month in which magazines photoshopping curvaceous celebs have made headlines,
American Eagle’s bold move may pay off with consumers who are starting to get
fed up with photo alterations.” http://time.com/1187/american-eagle-ditches-photoshop-for-new-lingerie-campaign/ Based
on the ad, I will continue to check out the product line and it does compel me
to shop there more than I would at say Victoria’s Secret, where airbrushing and
supermodels go hand in hand. I also
would recommend Aerie over other stores because they are making an effort. They
can’t break the mold yet, but they are trying to make positive steps.
My conclusions from this assignment are that it
seems that advertisers are starting to realize that women aren’t all
supermodels and we need to be able to relate to women more like us. I also believe they are trying to make their
clothing more appealing to teenagers who don’t have perfect bodies. I don’t believe they are doing it out of the
kindness of their hearts, I think it is a great marketing campaign that has
really got people talking and has convinced girls that it is better to shop
there because they really do care about them – even though the bottom line for
stores will always be how much more product they can sell. At least it is a step in the right direction.
Jennifer,
ReplyDeleteGreat points! I agree with you that the company doesn't "care" about the consumer...only the money in their pockets. And it is still concerning to see all of the girls are a certain size. What happens to the many, many young girls who are not "that" size? Have the marketers refused to do research on average sized girls they are marketing to?
It is a super great blog! Really made me think and question.
Thank you for sharing,
April